e., AT-AT, AT-TA, GC-AT, CG-TA, GC-GC GC-CG) using density functional theory (DFF). The proton affinity
of the DNA intercalator daunomycin in water was computed to be 159.2 kcal/mol at BP86/TZ2P, which is in line with the experimental observation that daunomycin is protonated under physiological conditions. The intercalation interaction of protonated daunomycin with two stacked DNA base pairs was studied through a hybrid approach in which intercalation is treated at LDA/TZP while the molecular structure of daunomycin and hydrogen-bonded Watson-Crick pairs is computed at BP86/TZ2P. We find that the affinity of the drug for the six considered base pair dimers decreases in the order AT-AT > AT-TA this website > GC-AT >
GC-TA > GC-CG > GC-GC, in excellent agreement with experimental data on the thermodynamics of the interaction between daunomycin and synthetic polynucleotides in aqueous solution. Our analyses show that the overall stability of the intercalation complexes comes mainly from pi-pi stacking but an important contribution to the computed and experimentally GSK621 mouse observed sequence specificity comes from hydrogen bonding between daunomycin and hetero atoms in the minor groove of AT base pairs.”
“CORMIE, P., M. R. MCGUIGAN, and R. U. NEWTON. Adaptations in Athletic Performance after Ballistic Power versus Strength Training. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 42, No. 8, pp. 1582-1598, 2010. Purpose: To determine whether the magnitude of improvement in athletic performance and the mechanisms driving these adaptations differ in relatively weak individuals exposed to either ballistic power training or heavy strength training. Methods: Relatively GS-9973 weak men (n = 24) who could perform the back squat with proficient technique were randomized into three groups:
strength training (n = 8; ST), power training (n = 8; PT), or control (n = 8). Training involved three sessions per week for 10 wk in which subjects performed back squats with 75%-90% of one-repetition maximum (1RM; ST) or maximal-effort jump squats with 0%-30% 1RM (PT). Jump and sprint performances were assessed as well as measures of the force-velocity relationship, jumping mechanics, muscle architecture, and neural drive. Results: Both experimental groups showed significant (P <= 0.05) improvements in jump and sprint performances after training with no significant between-group differences evident in either jump (peak power: ST = 17.7% +/- 9.3%, PT = 17.6% +/- 4.5%) or sprint performance (40-m sprint: ST = 2.2% +/- 1.9%, PT = 3.6% +/- 2.3%). ST also displayed a significant increase in maximal strength that was significantly greater than the PT group (squat 1RM: ST = 31.2% +/- 11.3%, PT = 4.5% +/- 7.1%). The mechanisms driving these improvements included significant (P <= 0.